“Obviously, the great contradistinction here is Europe, where, you know, it’s like people have given up, and we — I really hope that turns around in Europe,” he added.

Europe is giving up by having ethical, human focused, and probably open source AI/and not firing all their scientists and researchers? Meanwhile the GOP is literally trying to sneak language into a spending bill banning regulation for a decade?

What a pizza shit.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why does it feel like all the worst people are working together to fuck over the world?

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m still failing to see enough upsides to AI to justify the mad rush all these greedy arseholes are to get it into everything.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      He’s such an awful, ghoulish vampire, him, the oracle guy and the paypal mafia. Why are these people taken more seriously than senile crackheads like they’re USA presidents.

      They belong in mental asylums with mouth gags permanently attached to contain their mental poison.

  • CptOblivius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well because AI has been mostly hype and worthless. It has uses, but not as life changing as promised. And extremely energy intensive.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think it could be life changing, but true progress will take time, like any tech. There’s a reason most scientists know you can’t just throw money at something and just make it work. That’s why technocracy and the idea of chosen elite is so fucking dumb.

      Imagine if in the 80s we had just said ok, Steve Jobs did it. We’re done here. We don’t give any outside voices or ideas in tech a chance unless Jobs gives it the ok first. Imagine how much cool shit we would have missed out on if people hadn’t just said fuck it I don’t need all that money, I’ll just make my own shit and make it work with what I have.

      Innovation and progress does not flourish in a neatly controlled box, and most people that don’t just buy other people’s work know that. That’s the real reason people started pushing for DEI. Not just bc it was the “PC” thing to do. It helps bring new perspectives which then leads to new ways of thinking and problem solving.

      If you completely isolate AI you may get some cool shit but eventually if you just buy out the entire market to fit your singular vision you get repeating/boring and stale.

      I’m pretty sure they think they’re at a point where if they just keep throwing money at it, it will just start getting creative and update itself, but when it’s as unreliable as it is, I don’t see that happening anytime soon

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It will hit the average person in ways they cant see, my firm isnt replacing retirements because they can be filled by AI. What was once a vital role has been downgraded to the point where it can be completed by an AI, their manager now handles the back office parts and AI escalationz which given their nature will reduce overtime. In a business unit of ~40 people 7 have retired without issue and there are no plans to replace the rest as they go.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, I’d doubt it. Its quite a robust system that has been trialed extensively on a use case by case basis. Its also not directly customer facing.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Who cares what Peter Thiel thinks about anything. He’s a leading cause of the plutocracy that is now happening in the United States, and that’s one of his better points.

    Even if he was knowledgeable on the subject he has a biased take anyway.

    • Spookyghost@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Teal boy has a bias alright, it’s the lense of pure fucking evil and greed.

      The only care I have for his opinion is to know it to actively do the opposite at every occasion in an effort to make the world a better place.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m not saying I believe its important, the president believes it’s important bc Thiel has been funding him and making policy decisions since his first term, most people (myself included) just didn’t notice it until the second one.

      The first time, he tried to promote AI deregulation while insisting we would retain American values that helped us be better than China’s surveillance state, but then Trump lost power and Thiel lost 4 years of progress at the global AI table because of those values (democracy and the constitution). Now that he’s gotten his seat back he’s not going to risk ever letting it go. IF he ever intended to try to maintain or respect those values before, he certainly doesn’t now.

      That is why the truth behind Trump/JD Vance/Adrian Vermeule’s argument for a constitutional interpretation of strong executive authority needs to be made loud and clear.

      I cannot comprehend how anyone who is not already a billionaire could be dumb enough to support this, but let’s just be honest about what you’re supporting.

  • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    For a brief brief moment I was elated when I parsed the title as ‘Palantir says it has given up on AI’. Then I read the article and was left dejected.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I personally have no problem with AI (all your problems with AI can be solved by overthrowing capitalism), but I don’t want to hear anything from these guys.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    AI is most useful for surveillance and social engineering. It’s no wonder all the fascists love it.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I wish we would have given up on it … but that shit is still creeping in everywhere.

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Given up? I am not sure we even tried and with good reason, it’s a dumb technology based entirely on hype.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What an ignorant statement. Unlike other hypes, AI is far from dumb and has a lot of useful applications that could better the world.

      What’s dumb is the hyped up solutions everyone is talking about.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ok yeah AI is a broad collection of algorithms, but most people when hear AI will think the current iteration of llm models. That’s how I used it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      We should just wall off Florida (all my world improvement plans involve walling off Florida), stick them in there and then have the AI administer their lives, and see how long they last.