Nom Nom Nom…

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Idk how true that is. I think its more that if we’re just going to have random people shooting folks at events it seems less bad if the people shot are the ones with a giant megaphone saying that the shootings should be seen as inevitable.

    Its like, at least the guy that got shot had lived as millionaire for a decade and its not some kid this time

    I can’t point to anyone notable that couldn’t be an AI or right winger sockpuppet account that actually cheered it on in the same sort of way that like republican politicians gleefully celebrated nancy pelosi’s husband being attacked.

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Kirk’s killing is inherently more political. School shootings are a slightly different matter. I don’t think Robinson was capable of killing random people. He chose his target. It was an assassination.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I would argue all school shootings are political because they’re a result of a policy and distinguishing Kirk as a political figure is just some bullshit. Kirk also is not a politician. He’s just well connected to republican party donors, many of whom also own large portions of the US media.

        Kirk was a rich guy and a friend of donors. This makes him “Important” in US media. Avg people probably are largely unaware of who he was before he died, so I disagree that this is a “political” assassination and more like a “celebrity” assassination similar to John Lennon

        Still bad and stupid but the shooter’s motives were probably more about his loved ones being harrassed by kirk fans than anything truly ideological.