What I mean is like for example, a person having “gravitational pull” or someone making a “quantum leap” makes no sense to anyone who knows about physics. Gravity is extremely weak and quantum leaps are tiny.

Or “David versus Goliath” to describe a huge underdoge makes no sense to anyone who knows about history, because nobody bringing a gun to a sword fight is going to be the underdog but that’s essentially what David did.

I’m looking for more examples like that.

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t think the phrase “learning curve” has any built-in suggestion, even culturally, to imply that the reasonable default assumption is one way or the other. I only ever heard learning curve to refer to something getting easier after awhile, which is indeed a valid curve

    • Ideonek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sure. I could’ve been more precise, when people say or imply a “steep learning curve”.

        • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The problem is the location of the steepness makes the difference between whether this means it’s easy first and slow progress later, or slow progress first and easy later. Is it like, x^1.5, or is it like ln(x)? Both are very steep at some point.