That patent is essentially trying to say that if you do anything more than a randomly selected behaviour, based on a database, related to previous user interactions, you are infringing the patent.
At the same time, the mechanics in the filed patent also depend upon the creation of a database based on the user’s past behaviour.
The implications are just that, if you have more lawyer money than WB, then you can make and sell your game.
That patent is essentially trying to say that if you do anything more than a randomly selected behaviour, based on a database, related to previous user interactions, you are infringing the patent. At the same time, the mechanics in the filed patent also depend upon the creation of a database based on the user’s past behaviour.
The implications are just that, if you have more lawyer money than WB, then you can make and sell your game.