• 9 Posts
  • 994 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle





  • Nah, his complaint was lack of torque. Very strange, never got it. Figured he was repeating fossil fuel propaganda. But he was a motorhead!

    And yes, energy density is the thing no one talks about when raging against fossil fuels. A gallon of refined gasoline packs insane energy. I’ve run my 5-gallon, crappy Harbor Freight generator all night into the morning, powering the camp, heaters and all, never came close to emptying it. Contrast that with a monster LIPO4 battery that died in 48-hours only powering LED lights. (Gotta admit, something weird happened there.)


  • Had an ex-friend who was a motorhead arguing that electric motors will never beat ICE because they lack comparable torque. Look, I’m no mechanic, but I never got my head around that.

    “You mean they don’t have enough torque to run a US destroyer?! Someone should call the Navy.”

    Seriously, if you’ve played with even a tiny electric motor, provide DC, it goes, instantly. What could he have possibly been trying to say?





  • They say the same exact things you quoted without hammering them into slogans, same meanings though. Their voters aren’t as easily swayed by quickie little blurbs, they aim a little higher, longer sentences, but the messages still lack meaning. But maybe that’s why their messaging isn’t hitting? Would you argue the Democrats are winning the propaganda war?

    You want to argue the Democrats have real policies of substance? Real plans to move our economy and society forward? Because all I see them doing is killing the tiny minority that have articulated plans. You want to argue the Democrats aren’t imploding? I gave examples I think we mostly agree on around here. You gonna address any other part of my comment?

    Lemmy: We hate Democrats, but don’t dare compare them to the GOP! We’ll call you out for ‘both sides’ and nullify your opinion!"









  • Resources and money are basically the same thing. Spread it around equally, well, kinda like the opening of Snow Crash:

    …once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would consider to be prosperity…

    (Awesome novel about late-stage capitalism and arguably the grandson of Gibson’s cyberpunk fiction.)

    Yes, our needs could be met at current economic levels and population. But as population and education increase, people want more and more and more. It’s wired into our monkey brains. If everyone has the same shit, many will want more shit. Spread it all around evenly, you’ve only created hyper-inflation.

    I don’t have an answer. We didn’t evolve to work in groups of more than 150, 200 max.


  • Dad popped up drunk at a big college party one night. Went upstairs and saw he had 15 kids sitting around the room in a rough circle. As I walked in I heard, “YOU! Change places with him and argue his point. Switch up.”

    Confused looks, brains readjusted, off they went, back to the debate.

    Dad always said if you couldn’t argue the other side, you didn’t understand the argument. I have never found that notion to be false.

    (Cue the posts telling me their favorite point is unarguable, simply right. I can present the other side of anything. Even if I know it’s bullshit, there is another side, and it’s likely more logical than you think.)