Anubis never worked for me on mobile. I’m afraid of mass adoption if that won’t be fixed.

His name is so fitting for a satyrical military action figure.

It’s not infinite as long as the person with powers isn’t immortal and the engine generating energy needs maintenance.

It’s funny because trip-hop landed in pretty much elitist, conceptual album category for snobs and luxury products’ ads, with sampling being one of it’s core features. Useless gateekeping and/or mischaracterising the ‘art’ word as something well-defined.

If so, you are fucked.

The sense of security is what makes the tongues talk and the users browse, them incriminating themselves openly. Overly violent law that puts everyone in the grey zone allows you to pick anyone you want at any time and jail them. Government/party structure of any size is pretty much unable to track everyone 24/7, so while it’s seemingly a compromise from the idealistic vision of the great firewall, it is better to control a thing that organically rise with or without your involvement. If it could’ve been inpenetrateable, we could’ve heard of alternative systems appearing, but there you see none of these, at least for average consumers. It is there, and while it’s not overingineered, it’s enough to make 50% of safe, normie people give up and other 50% marks itself, and, unless everything is e2e encrypted, writes it’s court cases for itself.

Schools in my area had a dress code, and my school almost succeeded at requiring a select jacket model as a must (done by a single local company connected to a school admin, wink-wink), but faced backlash over poor price/quality balance 🙃

One of the unusual upsides, many men well in their 20s, who otherwise couldn’t be bothered, had their high school formal suits to wear on future funerals and weddings. I was one of them and that was handy.

If the uniform should be there, to ensure it’s not hostile, it may be:

1. Of basic rules. Formal dresses, dark under the waist line, white over it.
2. Civilian models, without a glimpse of cop/military details and ranks, insignias.
3. Common to everyone without any color differentiation (and requirements to buy it in exact shade of a color).
4. Rather cheap or even subsidized, shared from older to younger kids, because children are frequently growing out of them and it’s a bummer to buy ten+ sets of dresses.
5. Purposely unisex and non-sexualized models.

deleted by creator

One half-finished racing game that boasted having the largest open world at the time on consoles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_(video_game)

And it looked impressive in some biomes with natural disasters, but other than that it’s miles and miles of (comfy?) desolation and boredom. If not for scattered remains of gameplay, it could’ve been it’s own art thing.

In the age of social media, content has a strong boost of community participation. Those who pirated [x] talked about it and therefore added to the hype, gave incencitive for other to try it or buy it. After a month or so it’s hard to hook anyone other than with big sales or updates.

I’d argue, that it sometimes adds complexity to an already fragile system. Like when we implement touchscreens instead of buttons in cars. It’s akin to how Tesla, unlike Waymo, dropped LIDAR to depend on regular videoinputs alone. Direct control over systems without unreliable interfaces, semantic translation layer, computer vision dependancy etc serves the same tasks without additional risks and computational overheads.

LLM is what usually sold as AI nowadays. Convential ML is boring and too normal, not as exciting as a thing that processes your words and gives some responses, almost as if it’s sentient. Nvidia couldn’t come to it’s current capitalization if we defaulted to useful models that can speed up technical process after some fine tuning by data scientists, like shaving off another 0.1% on Kaggle or IRL in a classification task. It usually causes big but still incremental changes. What is sold as AI and in what quality it fits into your original comment as a lifesaver is nothing short of reinvention of one’s workplace or completely replacing the worker. That’s hardly hapening anytime soon.

If we actually want to maintain our standard of living and reduce the population size, we may very well need AI automation utilities. They can keep scaling down in size and power consumption in the way that a real human can’t.

Theoreticisizing LLM’s usefulness and resourcefulness doesn’t help you there. For now they are rather useless embaracingly inefficient resoucehogs existing purely because of the bubble. It’s a gamble at best, or a waste of resources and a degradation of human workforce at worst.

Drunktexting and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

The main point why I wrote it was that I don’t find them either bots or artifical influencers. They do probably want to have some reach or fresh blood, but don’t want their local culture to be spread too thin like it’s reddit 2.0. They are anything but cancer that I’ve met seeing real botfaming ops.

And, although I don’t share many of their thoughts, most of the posts I see in my feed discuss common issues where we aren’t that far from each other. Closer, than to maga/zionist/z-crowd. And in that context I find it alright to not draw any lines and just talk.

When things start to get overly political, well, that’s a whole another thing, where different bestest solutions are incompatible, historical betrayals are dugged up and the internet infighting ensues. It’s exhausting and pointless with just 2mil mostly irrelevant nerds on Fediverse. It’s easier to just scroll through some amuzing takes, and instead focus on things where we can cooperate.

You’ve ignored whatever I said to drop a one-line generalized response, not an organic one, and didn’t elaborate why it relates to what I said.

Isn’t that a behavior of a useful tool you alert others against? I don’t assume you are one. But I get some vibes you don’t act in a good faith there.

There are obviously agents from elsewhere, and some of them may be pretty effective, but it’s nothing compared to Trump and Co getting money from the likes of Saudis and acting like they own the place. If the main concern is american politics, well, the real worms aren’t theoretical or real foreign enemies, but corrupted fuckheads that ignore human, state rights, shutdown government, pack people from the streets to deport. No enemy could’ve done such damage so-called friends are doing.

I wouldn’t call them that. Most if not all of them are genuine people with some having accs for many years before Reddit crossed the line for most of us and them becoming anyhow relevant to interfere. In a recent hexbearean post about fediverse negativity I’ve read a couple of opinions with a notion that federating with others wasn’t that great, and they were pretty happy just by themselves. I assume, it’s the same for other two too. That’s a game too long and effortful to be a psyop imho. Their positions and where they get their info are things to argue, but let’s not get as far as dehumanizing them.

Almost everywhere I soundly proclaim that I am a russian dummy anarchist, that I live in that state for I have no options, and I angrily disagree with their fascination, mystification of what it is, I hold a grudge with anyone who wants that russki mir to be the model the whole world should share.

I, nevertheless, find a lot of points, like personal stuff and grieveancies, theoretical things, sympathy to protesters, to Gazan survivors that I share with them. Unlike transparently racist/fascist troll comms that were there, unlike their campaigns I’ve noticed, there is a huge population of real people worthy of talking, arguing with.

Call me any names and ban me, but as long as any person or community is supportive of basic pillar causes like body autonomy, you, like, can at least talk to them and find something in common.

What I missed though, is that Diva said the same, but misleadingly doubted the existence of russian bot networks. Them and state suppression ruined the rusophonic space to that degree I dropped it altogether. I don’t know how their actions affected other countries, but as a nolifer shitposting addict trying to trust them just a bit, I came through fire, water and copper tubes before dropping them altogether. They are like current Twitter, but worse. And, well, fuck, I wasn’t abandoning that to find the next option already corrupted.

That test sounds like a model trainroad but for billionaires.

I’d counter, but realistically just add to your sentiment by vouching for having non-online alternatives for most of our needs. Banking and government’s services in my country are on the edge of going full web/sim-driven, and I don’t like it that way. If I happen to get the delivery from my post office, they default to sms confirmation, and I’m not sure if I can get my parcel just by showing my ID card.

Internet access should be a human right, just as avoiding it should.

Tripping = 1 ÷ Power