Profile pic is from Jason Box, depicting a projection of Arctic warming to the year 2100 based on current trends.
While I do think that it’s simply bad at generating answers because that is all that’s going on, generating the most likely next word that works a lot of the time but then can fail spectacularly…
What if we’ve created AI but by training it with internet content, we’re simply being trolled by the ultimate troll combination ever.
I’m exactly that kind of person, would rather order online and no contact, or self checkout. Yet I still feel that pushing that to every service isn’t right. Insert Jurassic Park quote here. Maybe doing things just because we can isn’t the best qualifier.
Popular Science had an “open source” robot lawnmower plans in the…80s? I have it somewhere. Old enough that it used deep cycle lead-acid batteries and spinning round dremel blades. No laser to cut the grass, although it did use LEDs for sensors for grass height.
I have cats, and two Eufys, one for each floor. I don’t run them every day since the cats are all shorthair and it takes a bit to add up, but it’s nice to just let it go for a bit and check in.
And do that. Don’t assume the vacuum is strong enough to suck things all the way in. They can easily be clogged the first run through and then you’re just pushing crap around. Should carry the lesson over to any automation. Trust to a certain level, but know what it can and cannot do and when to step in.
I wish that commenting would automatically upvote a post. It’s far too late to fix the use of an upvote as approval of subject discussion and not just an agree arrow, but I often…no, I almost always forget to upvote the initial topic even after leaving a few paragraphs. One would hope whatever algorithm is used also considers activity and number of comments in a rating or suggesting it to others.