Nice. You you restore often?

How often do you do this?

Rigth - and downvotes fixes it? This is lunacy and detrimental to discussion/sharing. You can spot «danger for someone» just about anywhere you look.

Now the question was if you sometimes drink strategically. Drinking all the time or every day isn’t drinking strategically.

Try being human sometimes, and not trying to outdo each other being «perfect». Unless you’re 14 and trying to fit in…

Or just a fancy way to say canibal?

Just make sure those pesky British stay out of your potatoes

https://gastrogays.com/fridheimar-iceland/

https://www.vaxa.co/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varmaland

Cba adding more but they are rather good at it

Do the laws say you need to store this after verification? I mean a one time verification on account creation would work?

22 60 12 12

Neat! Most people need to put their hand or a conch shell to their ear to hear it

There are loads of laptops with mobile data. For calling its the phone company stopping it

Those are 170% maybe the seeds or not. Probably either or

That depends on what your error is. It’s not a magic process, it just tries to help you with formatting. The validate is the magic, it helps you spot errors as you make them.

How would this affect the big players? Like MS -you buy from the European branch and they use buy from US. So hitting them with tariffs would hurt MS more than their customers?

I understand they will raise prices, but its not like with physical goods where the same item is resold. They use other ways to transfer money because tax

Does it even fucking matter what’s banned in what echo chamber??

Thanks. My setup is way over complicated with 3 hosts in a cluster and shared storage, so local storage on the hosts stay unused. But i have been thinking about redoing it with separate hosts. This solution looks promising for sharing data, even if just on one host

So lxc containers and not vm’s

Could you explain further with a bit more detail? I havnt looked at this in a while but back then the options where virtiofs or nfs

If you want to share storage you need some way of doing that. Zfs is a good option for storage on vm-host level, but ist not designed for shared usage. Im not sure what you are after, but maybe you want zfs storage inside the vm for snapshots, dedup etc? Or maybe you want to share your media storage between vm’s? The first case you can use zfs inside your vm, it does not know or care about how its disks are stored or of they are a physical drive. For the second use-case you want some way to share drives, like smb, nfs etc. or a distributed filesystem if you really want to over complicate things. Truenas might be over overkill for sharing a few volumes, but you need something. I believe you can share zfs over nfs now but i have never used that outside of proxmox cluster storage

I use both debian on a vm with samba+nfs and a bare metal truenas for my needs. Find your needs and figure out what solves them

So you mount the pool to each vm that needs the shared data? Afaik zfs is not made for concurrency

How is this bad news? Dire situation?? They are not where they want to be with this “feature” so they delay it. Sounds like a smart move. Probably second best option to just dropping it