Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.
Got a lot of people to click on it while raging, though, so it served its purpose.
In case anyone’s interested in the source material, here’s the press release it’s going on about. The AI is about searching and analyzing evidence, it isn’t fabricating anything that’ll actually be used in court.
Unfortunately, it’s still a democracy. The electorate wanted what’s now going on. That could rapidly change at this point, but for now not yet.
And a lot of faceless people are also making excuses about how they never wanted to have faces in the first place, and it’s good that they’re gone.
Like the guy whose daughter died of measels. He said it was God’s will. God created measles. God allowed the disease to take his daughter’s life.
I knew that there would be people like this, but it’s still hard to grasp.
Volkswagen did okay. Mind you, only after Hitler’s empire had collapsed and Hitler himself had eaten a bullet.
Elon, if you’re listening…
Stack Overflow has been toxic for a long time already. It’s one of the things that a lot of people seem pleased to see AI devour.
This guy’s court cases are widely misunderstood by the general public.
In a nutshell: he’s a crank who is trying to tell the court “I don’t hold a copyright to the thing my AI produced, my AI holds the copyright.”
And the court tells him: “Only people (or legal persons, like corporations) can hold a copyright. Your AI cannot. If you say that you yourself don’t either, we can’t force you to have a copyright on it. So I guess that thing has no copyright and is therefore in the public domain.”
And then everyone gasps and exclaims “the court just ruled that AI-generated things are in the public domain!”