

Not really. The first local login to configure it requires a Plex account. And that account times out maybe monthly? It seems every few months when I remote to the Plex server it wants the plex account to login.
Not really. The first local login to configure it requires a Plex account. And that account times out maybe monthly? It seems every few months when I remote to the Plex server it wants the plex account to login.
The problem with Plex is it isn’t fully hosted. Plex controls user passwords. You can’t use it without logging into their servers.
"As of January 20, 2025, nearly 3 years later, there has been no public acknowledgement of the plagiarism, nor retraction of the content in the WAN Show upload with 2,000,000 views. The WAN Show upload and LMG Clips videos do not reference or cite GamersNexus either verbally or on screen at any point for the EVGA story. "
https://gamersnexus.net/gn-extras/our-response-linus-sebastian
Yeah, it is proof that Linus acknowledged it
The receipts show LTT plagerized, Linus promised to fix it but didn’t. Steve thanked him expecting that Linus would do what he promised but then Linus did nothing.
3 years later after GN publicized the unethical behavior, Linus then, and only then fixed it.
the writers to not forget citations again and put up a pinned comment, which he did,
But he didn’t. He promised to but never did until 3 years later. That’s why Steve called him out.
So LTT apologized and gave GN credit only after GN made it public and that’s not proof?
https://gamersnexus.net/gn-extras/our-response-linus-sebastian#linus-tech-tips-plagiarism
Read the emails. Linus said he’d fix it. GN thanked him for quick action but 3 years later LTT still hadn’t done anything.
The quote was from the linked article.
The email says they could keep it for further testing, not sell it.
LTT claimed they offered to pay for it but the time stamps prove they didn’t get an offer to pay for it until after GN publicized the mistake.
“Plagiarism by Linus Tech Tips of GamersNexus content wherein we previously privately reached out without resolution”
They had privately contacted LTT in the past. LTT ignored it until GN made a public video years later.
They took quick action 3 years after GN publicized LTT’s past bad behavior.
"…
Regarding LTT, we are simply going to state the relevant facts:
On 10th August, we were told by LTT via email that the block had been sold at auction. There was no apology.
We replied on 10th August within 30 minutes, telling LTT that this wasn’t okay, and that this was a £XXXX prototype, and we asked if they planned to reimburse us at all.
We received no reply and no offer of payment until 2 hours after the Gamers Nexus video went live on 14th August, at which point Linus himself emailed us directly.
The exact monetary value of the prototype was offered as reimbursement. We have not received, nor have we asked for any other form of compensation."
Time-stamped emails were provided as proof.
“quick action”
3 years later and only after Linus made vague legal threats to GN about Honey requiring GN to publicize LTT’s past bad behavior.
Regardless, you are failing to engage with my actual point, which is that unnecessary restrictions on the production of goods will drive manufacturers to produce only the most high-margin options,
Yet you gave the example of food being cheap which has regulations. It’s cheap because it is subsidized. Farmers aren’t the only industry with lobbiests.
how we built affordable housing in the past.
We killed the existing land owners so there was a surplus of land.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_Act_of_1949 (required cheap housing to be built to replace any cheap housing torn down.)
So, we should remove these barriers first and see what happens.
The only barrier is the people who vote. If a community votes against a developer, that’s their constitutional right. Which is why I said the supply is the problem. Giving more money to renters does not change the supply. If more housing was built, the price would go down and ubi wouldn’t be needed.
Unlike food and housing, a screwdriver isn’t required to live. That’s why food is subsidized and regulated. Whereas non essentials are allowed to compete in a free market.
The email chain was published by Billet Labs after LTT said there were no expectations of returning the prototype. It proved that Linus lied about it.
You can go to the grocery store right now and buy a tomato for not very much money,
Food is subsidized and highly regulated by the government.
LTT has done bad things and never apologized. For example he copied a gamersnexus script and never acknowledged it.
Capitalism fails to meet housing demand because it is constrained by regulations about things like single family zoning,
That’s not true because when given an opportunity to build housing, developers always choose to build higher margin premium housing. Capitalism incentivizes profit and there’s no profit in cheap housing.
Given that capitalism is a system, not an individual with intention, “won’t” is the wrong word.
That happened over 10 years ago with the release of Win 8.