• Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not that I condone Microsoft, but if it is a sanctioned country (Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc.). Microsoft will be in shit with the US government if they let it there.

    If the project has contributors from there, then I guess they need to move off GitHub like they did.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I interpret this toot correctly, there wasn’t a direct commit from a sanctioned region, but one developer was in one of those regions for a short while quite some time ago. And he may have been flagged because of this.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      All fair but with current us foreign policy I really have hard time respecting their authority on anything

      Mega corps gonna mega corp so that why there is a need for decentralization where possible. Otherwise we are all gonna be enslaved by a few mentally ill people with out any check or balace.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I don’t disagree. Corporations shouldn’t exist imo, but they do and if you don’t want to host your own things then we have to work with them.

          • TechnoCat@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Cooperatives are still a corporation, but the ownership is distributed more than the CEO style corporation we are used to.

            • Chris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Are there any 501c3’s out there that I can host with? That would be the dream. Unless I guess buying into a cooperative of those exist

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think the point above currently we are relying on mega corps data centers and there is not practical way to replace that right now or in the near future.

                With that being said, every household could theoretically have a small sever and we all can create clusters to support local needs needs with out having to pay the toll to the parasite.

                Today’s self hosting pinoneers could be the back bone of future decentralized internet.

              • TechnoCat@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                A membership cooperative isn’t a bad idea I suppose for a cloud service. I think having users vote on the administration of a service could get hard to work with though unless the vote was to delegate it out.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a really strong argument for not depending on non-federated, centrally controlled services. It doesn’t matter which country or company is behind Your Favorite Service™, they can be legally mandated to by Oppressive Regime (“it could never happen in my country!”), or they could just be arbitrary assholes.

      I don’t care why Microsoft did it. I moved off Github when MS acquired them, although in this case it probably wouldn’t have made a difference. Regardless, what it proves is that you can not rely on a monopoly.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t think federation saves us. If the server owners are in the states they still have to comply. I don’t know for certain, but I think if there are us citizens using it, some laws might compel non us based servers as well.

        The only way around it that I can think of is tor. That doesn’t make it legal it would just be harder to stop.

        All of this is assuming the US justice department would even care enough though.

        https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/03/us-government-reminds-non-us-companies-to-comply-with-sanctions-and-export-controls

        A non-US person that causes a US person to violate US sanctions or engage in conduct that evades US sanctions may itself become subject to US sanctions.

        I don’t know the text of the sanctions, but lemmy.world could be under US jurisdiction if they allow me to violate sanctions.

        Seems pretty dumb to me that the US has been allowed to assert itself this much.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean blocking specific countries is stupid anyway. Historically China has been playing games with the EU and the US on a geopolitical level. But: Chinese, European as well as American researchers have been at the core of research on current topics like AI, security, etc. Btw. ironically the scientific landscape is very collaborative and borders on a federated model, it’s actually pretty neat how much researchers don’t care about country of origin.

        What I’m saying is introducing geopolitics into open source development or research is one of the most stupid things to do, because it punishes both your and the other country and only benefits uninvolved third parties. It’s literally shooting yourself in the foot.

    • Dultas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they can tell they’re from a banned region why are they letting them push in the first place. Sounds like a convenient excuse.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Problem is that unless the person was paid for contributing, what goods or services are being exchanged with the project. I mean if Microsoft received money from that person for a subscription or something I might see them having to ban the user and refund the money. But what did the project receive that would violate sanctions? Volunteer work is usually not covered or else relief organizations and religious missionaries would be banned and the US historically loves sending those. What am I missing?

    • -☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      its sad that this is what the country decided to do. FOSS has nothing to do with the wars waged by politicians, sometimes at the expense of the very people trying to collaborate together despite chauvinism.

      i imagine it will sadly get worse as these types of conflicts escalate.