Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Nearly half” of US citizens are right, because about 75% of the US population is functionally or clinically illiterate.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I think the specific is that 40% of adult Americans can’t read at a seventh grade level.

      Probably because they stopped teaching etymology in schools, So now many Americans do not know how to break a word down into its subjugate parts.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        21% of adults in the US are illiterate in 2024.

        54% of adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level (20% are below 5th-grade level).

        https://www.thenationalliteracyinstitute.com/2024-2025literacy-statistics

        Specifically it is about 75% of the population being functionally or clinically illiterate as I said. This is more likely caused by the fact that American culture is anti intellectual, and not the lack of being taught etymology, as etymology has little to do with literacy.

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yes, English is absolutely full of words that can be deciphered from their roots.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I’d be curious, it seems more common in Latin based languages, whereas English seems to be a lot more… Free form?

            • bizarroland@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              21 hours ago

              There is an etymology word joke that says something along the lines of, “if “pro” is the opposite of “con”, then is the opposite of “congress” “progress”?”

              And if you don’t know etymology, then that seems to make sense.

              When you break down the word Congress, you get the prefix con and the root word gress, con means with, and gress means step, so it means to step with or to walk with.

              The opposite of walking with someone is to walk apart from someone, so, the actual opposite of congress would be digress, and the opposite of progress would be regress.

              Etymology is great at ruining jokes, but it’s also great at helping you understand what words mean and why they mean them.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                so, the actual opposite of congress would be digress

                How about transgress.

                • bizarroland@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  The word trans means across, or on the other side, and gress once again would mean step, so to transgress is basically to cross the line, right?

                  I did a quick search, but there isn’t really a word to describe the people that don’t cross the line.

                  The opposite of the prefix trans is the prefix cis, which means “on the same side”

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 hours ago

                    con is with, di apart, both in the “is apart” and “drifts apart” way, also “between” and “not”, and trans is, well, also apart, but implying some sense of border, not just (conceptual) distance. I’d say that digress and transgress are comparatively synonym (if you squint in just the right way) and both antonym to congress.

                    intragress might be an alternative to the missing cisgress, especially as ingress already exists. And then we could have extragress for being not on the inside but not beyond the pale, either.

                    Or we could stop this silliness and cast out the Normans.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              English is a mish-mash hodgepodge of two dozen other languages, many (most?) of which are Romantic/Latin-based.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      According to the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, 2013, the median score for the US was “level 2”. 3.9% scored below level 1, and 4.2% were “non-starters”, unable to complete the questionnaire.

      For context, here is the difference between level 2 and level 3, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_the_International_Assessment_of_Adult_Competencies#Competence_groups :

      • Level 2: (226 points) can integrate two or more pieces of information based on criteria, compare and contrast or reason about information and make low-level inferences
      • Level 3: (276 points) can understand and respond appropriately to dense or lengthy texts, including continuous, non-continuous, mixed, or multiple pages.