cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAngry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1584arrow-down126
arrow-up1558arrow-down1external-linkAngry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoThey never said they’d do so natively with other protocols - but they support Bridgy, so you already can do that.
minus-squarePirata@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoInteresting how other instances of the fediverse have no such restrictions. It’s almost as if they want to make it as difficult as possible so that people just don’t federate.
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 minutes agoThere’s literally no restrictions other than simple rate limiting, which you can ask for exceptions for. I don’t know a Mastodon/lemmy server which wouldn’t rate limit new peers
They never said they’d do so natively with other protocols - but they support Bridgy, so you already can do that.
Interesting how other instances of the fediverse have no such restrictions. It’s almost as if they want to make it as difficult as possible so that people just don’t federate.
There’s literally no restrictions other than simple rate limiting, which you can ask for exceptions for.
I don’t know a Mastodon/lemmy server which wouldn’t rate limit new peers