If the idea of robots taking on humans in a road race conjures dystopian images of android athletic supremacy, then fear not, for now at least.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That Boston Dynamics robot used to get knocked over every time they hit it with a broom. Used to. I for I’ve welcome our merciful and generous machine overlords.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Do these people miss slavery so much they have to build humanoid robots so they can own them?

    • lemmy689@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Some didn’t make it. Like the Pony Express, they swapped horses.

      Companies were also allowed to swap their androids with substitutes when they could no longer compete

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The first robot across the finish line, Tiangong Ultra – created by the Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center – finished the route in two hours and 40 minutes.

    The winner of the men’s race on Saturday finished in 1 hour and 2 minutes.

    What a misleading headline. This was a 13 mile race. The robots lost by about 8 miles.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That comes out to a speed of 7.5km/h or 4.7mph, barely above a brisk walk. Good to know if I ever need to outrun humanoid robots it won’t be hard. (The self-driving cars are another matter).

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Robots kind of suck compared to humans in terms of energy efficiency, sure a factory robot arm can crush you but if it had to run on the electricity equivelent of a bowl of bran flakes you could overpower it with one hand and not much effort. (barring an insane gear ratio which would make the thing incredibly slow)

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Robots are a lot more energy efficient than humans. Human muscles are around 25% efficient while robotic motors can be >90%. However they lose massively in energy density. 100 grams of carbs has 1.7 MJ of energy, which is equivalent to 2-3kg of lithium batteries. A human can run for hours on a kg of calorie dense foods, while a robot would need a bulky battery or constant battery swaps/recharges.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Thank goodness John Henry has taught us Americans that machines will never beat humans, so we obviously know how this will end. /s